In the corporate sphere , there are acts of wrongdoing that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter —a saga of alleged misconduct that deeply harms the reputation of a lone supervisor but brings scrutiny over the firm’s standards .
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has held onto his title , appearing untouched by the controversies engulfing him. How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of questionable behavior began with breaches of the business principles, but it didn’t stop at that . Instead, it intensified into a pattern of misconduct that has left team members disenchanted and partners bewildered .
While attending a professional growth course — intended to foster better management—David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a serious training session into a sequence of unprofessional occurrences. Insiders suggest he spent business-funded trips pursuing romantic liaisons , a blatant disregard of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the impropriety didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the gravest disclosures involves his alleged improper use of another source company IT systems to send explicit photos to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a violation of confidentiality . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including symbols celebrating indiscretions— exposes a personality of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite his relationship status and her having a significant other. This transparent exploitation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but led Ventia New Zealand to familial breakdowns —creating a trail of betrayal that extended far beyond the workplace .
What reason can this behavior be enabled to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still in a position of power at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, stems from a troubling lack of oversight within the firm . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins operates without restraint .
This deficiency of accountability sets a perilous example: that status and power within the firm can shield someone from repercussions . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , discourages team members, and ultimately harms the company’s standing .